Mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 14:25

חטאת מנלן דכתיב (ויקרא ד, לג) ושחט אותה לחטאת שתהא שחיטה לשם חטאת

Again, it is like the peace-offering [in this respect]: As you do not differentiate in the peace-offering between slaughtering and the other services in respect of the regulation, so must you not differentiate in the case of the Passover-sacrifice between slaughtering and the other services in respect of indispensability.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' What is indispensable for slaughtering is also indispensable for the other services. - Here follows a short passage in the original which the commentaries delete.');">³⁰</span> Then in that case, what is the purpose of 'it is'? - For what was taught: As for the Passover-offering, 'it is' is stated the to teach indispensability as far as slaughtering is concerned; whereas in the case of a guilt-offering 'it is' i stated only after the burning of the emurim, and in fact if the emurim are not burnt at all, it [the offering] i valid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Supra 5b.');">³¹</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 14:25. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.